Use case · Parts and sourcing
Catch the part that dies before your product does.
Circuitly reviews the design against live availability and lifecycle data from supported component sources — so EOL notices, stock cliffs, and single-source parts surface during review, not during a build.
The problem
The schematic is electrically right and commercially wrong: a regulator on last-time-buy, a connector with one supplier, a part whose lead time went from weeks to quarters. None of that is visible in the drawing, so it survives every conventional review and lands as a stopped production line.
Connected workflow
Because the harness connects component data alongside the schematic, every review checks the parts as parts: lifecycle status, stock depth, sourcing concentration, and the design’s exposure if a part disappears — with the affected circuits identified, not just a flagged MPN.
Read the BOM
Components resolved from the native design, not an exported list.
Check the market
Lifecycle, stock, and sourcing pulled from supported data sources.
Weigh the design
Risk mapped to the circuits and requirements each part touches.
Propose options
Candidate alternates and the engineering trade-offs, for an engineer to judge.
Risk output
- EOL, last-time-buy, and stock findings tied to affected circuits
- Single-source and high-exposure components, ranked
- Candidate alternates with the constraints they must satisfy
- A sourcing-risk section in the shareable review PDF
Team decision
Engineers and sourcing decide which risks to design out now and which to accept and monitor. The decision is recorded, so the next revision review knows what was already judged.
Find the supply problem while it’s still a schematic edit.
Run a review with component data connected and see what your BOM is hiding.